Top Alternatives to Percolate and Seismic for Content Marketing Teams

For years, Percolate served as the central hub for many content marketing teams — the place where campaigns were planned, content was created, and collaboration came to life. But when Seismic acquired Percolate and folded it into its broader sales enablement suite, marketers faced a choice: adapt to Seismic or find a true Percolate alternative.

While some teams found success within Seismic’s ecosystem, many others — especially those focused on content operations and creative collaboration — began searching for platforms that could better mirror the strategic and visual planning strengths of Percolate.

In this guide, we’re highlighting the top alternatives to both Percolate and Seismic for content marketing teams. Each platform is evaluated against a consistent set of criteria designed to show how well they replicate — and in some cases, improve upon — the original Percolate and Seismic experience.

Evaluation Criteria for Percolate and Seismic Alternatives 

Each platform was evaluated using the same feature criteria:

✅ = They fully have this feature

🟡 = They partially have this feature 

❌ = They do not have this feature

Campaign & calendar planning – A core functionality for 

Briefing – Platform offers a space to write creative briefs and have them live in context of when team members are working.  

Approvals workflow – The platform gives the ability to coordinate team members to do the work and approve the work.

Visibility across channels / teams – The platform offers a visual method to see marketing content and assets from other channels or teams. 

Marketing hierarchy – The platform offers a built-in method to set a hierarchy of marketing objects beyond just writing what they are in text. For example (campaign > initiative > asset).

In-context content preview – A cornerstone of content marketing platforms, true to life content can be created in the platform. 

Integrated asset management / library – Not necessarily a full-blown DAM, a Percolate alternative needs to have space to store and manage visual assets, including video. 

Content versioning & history – The ability to see all different versions of content and understand how the content changed over those different versions.

Real-time commenting – One of the most critical capabilities for a content marketing team, tools must provide the ability to leave comments on content in real-time. 

Brand guideline enforcement – Automated guardrails to ensure that copy and assets maintain the pre-set rules for the content produced in the platform.

User roles – A good foundational feature, the platforms need the ability to give certain user roles the ability to take certain actions, access certain areas and approve content.  

Audit trails – The platform must provide a full trail of all of the different actions that were taken throughout the creation and approval process for a piece of content. 

Social publishing integrations – A key element for content marketing teams that publish social, the ability to push approved posts directly to social platforms is a huge time saver. 

Opal 

Naturally, we put ourselves first, but there’s a good reason for that. Opal is a content operations platform built specifically for marketing organizations — not just generic project management. It’s trusted by enterprise brands such as Target, Starbucks, General Motors, UnitedHealthcare, and more to plan, create, and approve content across every channel. Already recognized as a leading Percolate and Seismic alternative, Opal gives marketing teams one shared space to orchestrate campaigns, manage approvals, and preview content in context before it goes live.

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	✅	Core to Opal: visual, multi-channel campaign and calendar planning.
Briefing	✅	Contextual creative briefs attached to the work where it happens.
Approvals workflow	✅	Built-in approvals that cover typical marketing review/approval needs without requiring extreme granularity.
Visibility across channels / teams	✅	Clear cross-team visibility via calendar and campaign views.
Marketing hierarchy	✅	Native hierarchy (e.g., Campaign → Story → Moment → Asset).
In-context content preview	✅	Signature capability: true-to-life previews for social and long-form; uniquely compare cross-channel messages around the same topic.
Integrated asset management / library	✅	Practical, integrated library for storing/organizing assets (goal isn’t to replace a full DAM).
Content versioning & history	✅	Full document version control with tracked changes and revision history.
Real-time commenting	✅	Inline, contextual comments and @mentions.
Brand guideline enforcement	🟡	Guardrails via templates/structure; enforcement is guided rather than fully automated.
User roles	✅	Role-based access and permissions.
Audit trails	✅	Activity and workflow history for accountability.
Social publishing integrations	✅	Publishing via integrations (e.g., Sprout Social, Dash Hudson, Sprinklr, and more).

Strengths

• Best-in-class planning & preview: Opal’s in-context previews (social + long-form) and side-by-side, cross-channel comparison around a single topic make it uniquely suited to multi-channel storytelling.
• Purpose-built hierarchy & visibility: Campaign-to-asset structure plus a visual calendar keeps teams aligned on what’s shipping, where, and why.
• Workflow that fits marketing: Approvals, comments, roles, audit trails, and integrated asset management are all built for day-to-day marketing collaboration.
• Ecosystem friendly: Publishes through integrations with leading social suites (e.g., Sprout, Dash Hudson, Sprinklr), so teams keep their best-of-breed tools.

Weaknesses

• Brand rule automation is light: Templates and structure help maintain consistency, but if you need hard enforcement of brand rules (e.g., fully locked layouts, automated tone checks), you’ll rely on process or adjacent tools.
• Not intended as a full DAM: The integrated library covers most marketing needs, but archival-grade DAM use cases (advanced rights, complex renditions, large-scale taxonomy ops) are better suited to a dedicated DAM.

Kapost

Kapost is a content operations and marketing platform built to bring structure and strategy to enterprise content creation. Designed for B2B and complex marketing organizations, it helps teams manage everything from campaign planning and content calendars to workflows and analytics. Over the years, Kapost has become a go-to Percolate and Seismic alternative, particularly for marketing teams that prioritize governance, collaboration, and alignment between content and buyer journeys.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	✅	Strong campaign and editorial calendar tools with rollups from campaigns to individual assets.
Briefing	✅	Supports content briefs and assignments tied to campaigns, giving creative teams clarity and context.
Approvals workflow	✅	Multi-step approval workflows configurable for complex teams and multiple reviewers.
Visibility across channels / teams	🟡	Limited visibility into in-flight content and cross-channel context — a common user complaint despite dashboard views.
Marketing hierarchy	✅	Built around a marketing object hierarchy (campaign → content type → asset), ideal for structured teams.
In-context content preview	❌	Does not provide true-to-life content previews or channel-accurate renderings.
Integrated asset management / library	✅	Includes an asset library to store, categorize, and manage content and metadata.
Content versioning & history	✅	Maintains a version history for each content item, enabling teams to track edits and revisions.
Real-time commenting	✅	Inline commenting and collaboration tools allow reviewers to give feedback directly on content.
Brand guideline enforcement	🟡	Brand consistency relies on templates and workflows; not automated or enforced by the system.
User roles	✅	Detailed role and permission controls support enterprise governance requirements.
Audit trails	✅	Activity logs record all workflow and publishing actions for compliance and visibility.
Social publishing integrations	✅	Offers social and CMS publishing integrations

Strengths

• Enterprise governance and structure – Kapost excels in complex environments where multiple teams, personas, and content types need to align around a single strategy.
• Workflow and approvals depth – Multi-step workflows and strong version tracking support sophisticated governance needs.
• Content-to-journey alignment – Built to map assets to buyer stages, helping B2B teams understand how content supports sales and demand generation.

Weaknesses

• No in-context previews – Kapost lacks true-to-life previews, forcing teams to review creative in external tools or staging environments.
• Limited visibility – Visibility into live campaigns, overlapping efforts, and cross-channel storytelling is limited — a critical gap for content marketing teams.
• Interface feels dated – The UI can be slower and less intuitive compared to newer, design-forward platforms.
• Heavy administrative setup – Robust configuration options can add friction for smaller or fast-moving teams.

Asana

Overview:
Asana is a popular work management platform that helps teams organize projects, track tasks, and manage workflows. While it isn’t purpose-built for content marketing, many teams use it to manage editorial calendars, campaigns, and approvals due to its flexible task structure and intuitive interface. As a Percolate alternative, Asana appeals to marketing teams seeking a low-friction, affordable option for project coordination — though it lacks the marketing-specific context, previews, and governance features of true content operations platforms.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	🟡	Task and project timelines can simulate calendars, but there’s no dedicated marketing campaign view.
Briefing	🟡	Creative briefs can be built using templates or custom fields, but there’s no structured brief workspace.
Approvals workflow	🟡	Approvals exist via task assignments and dependencies, but not true multi-stage or conditional workflows.
Visibility across channels / teams	🟡	Dashboards and boards show project status, but no channel-level or campaign-level visibility.
Marketing hierarchy	❌	Lacks native hierarchy beyond projects and subtasks; can’t represent marketing objects (campaign → initiative → asset).
In-context content preview	❌	No built-in preview capability; assets open in external apps or links.
Integrated asset management / library	🟡	Integrates with Google Drive, Dropbox, and Box for attachments but doesn’t manage assets natively.
Content versioning & history	🟡	Basic task history and comment tracking; no version control for creative content.
Real-time commenting	✅	Excellent real-time commenting and @mentions; collaboration is one of Asana’s strengths.
Brand guideline enforcement	❌	No built-in templates or automation for enforcing brand rules.
User roles	✅	Solid role-based access and permissions; supports project-level visibility controls.
Audit trails	🟡	Task histories and activity logs exist but aren’t designed for compliance-grade auditability.
Social publishing integrations	❌	No direct publishing or channel integrations; relies on external tools or custom automations.

Strengths

• Simplicity and flexibility – Asana’s task-based structure is easy to learn and adaptable to many team processes, making onboarding fast and intuitive.
• Excellent collaboration UX – Real-time commenting, tagging, and notification systems keep team communication smooth and centralized.
• Powerful automation – Rules, dependencies, and integrations (via Zapier or native connectors) allow marketing teams to automate basic workflows.
• Cost-effective entry point – Ideal for teams wanting to coordinate work and timelines without the commitment or cost of a dedicated content operations platform.

Weaknesses

• Not built for marketing – Asana’s structure doesn’t mirror marketing hierarchy, campaigns, or content types, leading to ad-hoc organization.
• No in-context previews – Teams can’t see how content looks in-channel; all creative reviews happen outside the platform.
• Limited visibility and reporting – Lacks multi-channel or campaign-level insights; dashboards require manual setup or integrations.
• No publishing capabilities – Asana is a great planning tool but offers no direct publishing or content delivery options.

Contently

Overview:
Contently is one of the most established content marketing platforms on the market, built to help enterprise brands plan, produce, and measure high-quality content at scale. Originally known for connecting companies with freelance creators, Contently has evolved into a full content operations system, offering tools for ideation, collaboration, workflow management, and analytics.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	✅	Offers editorial calendars and campaign views for planning and scheduling across multiple channels.
Briefing	✅	Strong briefing tools; allows detailed creative briefs tied directly to assignments and workflows.
Approvals workflow	✅	Supports multi-step approval workflows with review stages, deadlines, and task routing.
Visibility across channels / teams	🟡	Provides dashboards and content views, but lacks dynamic, multi-channel visibility in a single shared calendar.
Marketing hierarchy	❌	Organizes by campaigns and projects, but doesn’t support structured hierarchies like campaign → initiative → asset.
In-context content preview	❌	Offers only basic previews — not true-to-life, channel-specific renderings of content.
Integrated asset management / library	✅	Built-in content library with metadata and tagging; supports reuse and repurposing.
Content versioning & history	✅	Version history supported for all content pieces, showing revisions and approvals.
Real-time commenting	✅	Inline feedback and collaboration tools streamline the review process for editors and creators.
Brand guideline enforcement	🟡	Style guides and brand rules can be attached to briefs, but enforcement depends on manual review.
User roles	✅	Role-based permissions for editors, reviewers, freelancers, and admins.
Audit trails	✅	Tracks workflow history and approvals for compliance and visibility.
Social publishing integrations	✅	Integrates with CMSs and social publishing tools to distribute approved content.

Strengths

• End-to-end editorial workflow – Contently ties together ideation, briefing, production, and approval in a unified process.
• Freelance talent network – Its marketplace of vetted creators is a major differentiator for teams that rely on external contributors.
• Collaborative review environment – Inline comments and feedback loops make editorial collaboration efficient.
• Analytics and ROI tracking – Performance dashboards link content production to measurable outcomes.
• Governance-friendly – Roles, versioning, and audit logs make it enterprise-ready.

Weaknesses

• No true-to-life previews – Content previews are static and generic, making it hard for marketers to visualize how assets will look on social, web, or email.
• Limited visibility across channels – While it has dashboards, it lacks a holistic cross-channel view of in-flight content — a key capability for modern content teams.
• No marketing hierarchy – Cannot model structured campaign relationships (e.g., campaign → initiative → asset), limiting planning clarity.
• Interface feels heavy – The platform’s older design can make navigation and creative collaboration feel slower.
• Freelance marketplace focus – Great for outsourced production, but may feel redundant for teams with strong in-house creative resources.

Airtable

Overview:
Airtable is a flexible, no-code platform that combines the familiarity of a spreadsheet with the relational power of a database. Many marketing teams use it to manage content calendars, campaign briefs, and creative workflows. While it isn’t purpose-built for marketing, its adaptability and visual layouts (like grid, kanban, and calendar views) make it a popular Percolate alternative for teams that want structure without committing to a heavy enterprise system. Airtable’s open-ended design means it can become almost anything — but that flexibility can also lead to inconsistency and maintenance overhead over time.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	✅	Strong calendar and timeline views let teams plan campaigns and content visually.
Briefing	🟡	Creative briefs can be modeled using custom fields or forms, but there’s no dedicated briefing module.
Approvals workflow	🟡	Workflows are achievable with automations and status fields but lack built-in multi-stage approvals.
Visibility across channels / teams	🟡	Dashboards and shared views improve transparency, but there’s no dynamic, multi-channel visualization.
Marketing hierarchy	❌	Airtable can model relationships manually, but there’s no native marketing object hierarchy (e.g., campaign → asset).
In-context content preview	❌	No true-to-life previews; attachments or embeds are viewed as files, not in-channel representations.
Integrated asset management / library	🟡	Handles file attachments and asset libraries, but lacks metadata depth or versioned DAM functionality.
Content versioning & history	🟡	Revision history available at the record level, but no side-by-side or tracked-change comparisons.
Real-time commenting	✅	Supports comments and @mentions at the record level for team collaboration.
Brand guideline enforcement	❌	No brand governance features or template enforcement.
User roles	✅	Role-based permissions for bases, views, and fields offer solid control.
Audit trails	🟡	Activity history exists but isn’t robust enough for full compliance use cases.
Social publishing integrations	🟡	Publishing possible via integrations (Zapier, Make, or API), but not natively supported.

Strengths

• Highly customizable – Airtable’s relational database structure makes it easy to create custom marketing workflows, content pipelines, and calendars.
• Visual and approachable – Grid, gallery, kanban, and calendar views give teams a clear, flexible way to manage campaigns.
• Scalable integrations – Through automation tools like Zapier or native extensions, teams can connect Airtable to CMS, DAM, and social platforms.
• Great for smaller teams – Perfect for content or comms teams that need organization and visibility without heavy IT setup.

Weaknesses

• Publishing is indirect – Requires third-party connectors for posting or CMS integrations.
• Not purpose-built for marketing – Airtable’s flexibility is both a blessing and a curse; everything from workflows to approvals must be built from scratch.
• No in-context content previews – Teams can’t visualize posts or creative in-channel, which limits its usefulness for creative review.
• Limited governance – No structured hierarchy, brand rules, or audit-grade tracking.
• Manual upkeep – As workflows get more complex, maintaining bases and automations can become time-consuming and error-prone.

Censhare

Censhare is an enterprise-grade content management and digital asset management (DAM) platform built for global marketing operations. It unifies content, assets, product data, and publishing workflows in one system — giving teams a single source of truth for all marketing and communication materials. Because of its depth, flexibility, and omnichannel publishing capabilities, Censhare is often considered a Percolate or Seismic alternative for large organizations that need industrial-strength governance, complex workflows, and deep integration across tools and teams.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	❌	No true campaign planning workspace; lacks a freeform, visual calendar for organizing and ideating campaigns.
Briefing	🟡	Briefs can be modeled using templates or forms, but there’s no dedicated creative brief environment.
Approvals workflow	✅	Highly configurable multi-step approvals with granular routing and notifications.
Visibility across channels / teams	✅	Strong cross-channel visibility through asset relationships and publishing integrations.
Marketing hierarchy	✅	Fully supports hierarchical relationships (e.g., campaign → initiative → asset → channel output).
In-context content preview	🟡	Offers structured previews, though not visually rich or channel-accurate like marketing-focused tools.
Integrated asset management / library	✅	Core capability — includes full DAM with metadata, versioning, renditions, and rights management.
Content versioning & history	✅	Comprehensive version tracking with rollback options and detailed change history.
Real-time commenting	✅	Inline commenting and annotation tools for assets and content.
Brand guideline enforcement	✅	Strong templating, permissions, and workflow rules enforce brand consistency.
User roles	✅	Robust access controls designed for complex, multi-brand enterprises.
Audit trails	✅	Complete audit logs for compliance and traceability.
Social publishing integrations	❌	No native or turnkey social publishing; any publishing must be custom-integrated.

Strengths

• Enterprise governance powerhouse – Combines DAM, CMS, and workflow capabilities for complete control over marketing content.
• Robust structure and metadata – Ideal for managing massive content ecosystems with complex relationships and reuse needs.
• Comprehensive versioning and compliance – Full audit trails, brand enforcement, and governance built-in.
• Omnichannel content operations – Supports publishing across digital, print, and e-commerce — especially in large organizations.
• Highly customizable and scalable – Designed for global enterprises with dedicated operations and IT resources.

Weaknesses

• No campaign planning environment – Lacks a visual, collaborative campaign or editorial planning interface.
• Not built for creative collaboration – Geared toward content operations, not day-to-day marketing ideation.
• Limited in-context previews – Previews are static and lack channel-accurate representations.
• No social publishing – Cannot directly publish or schedule content for social media channels.
• Complex implementation and upkeep – Requires specialized expertise and long deployment timelines.

Monday

Monday.com is a popular work management and automation platform that helps teams plan, track, and collaborate on projects through customizable boards and visual dashboards. Marketing teams often adopt it as a lightweight Percolate alternative, using it for campaign calendars, content requests, and workflow tracking. Its colorful, visual interface makes it easy to see progress at a glance, and automations can simplify routine processes. However, while flexible and approachable, Monday.com lacks the structured hierarchy, in-context content previews, and marketing governance capabilities that enterprise content operations platforms provide.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	🟡	Calendar and timeline views provide basic scheduling, but campaign planning lacks a unified marketing context.
Briefing	🟡	Creative briefs can be created as form inputs or board templates, but they live as data fields, not true creative briefs.
Approvals workflow	🟡	Status-based workflows and automations allow for simple approvals; multi-stage or conditional approvals are limited.
Visibility across channels / teams	🟡	Dashboards show project status, but there’s no native cross-channel visualization or content hierarchy.
Marketing hierarchy	❌	Lacks built-in relationships for campaign → initiative → asset; everything is modeled manually with linked boards.
In-context content preview	❌	No true-to-life preview capability; assets open in external tools.
Integrated asset management / library	🟡	Supports file uploads and integrations (Drive, Dropbox, Box), but no metadata or DAM-like functionality.
Content versioning & history	🟡	Tracks task and update history, but not creative version control.
Real-time commenting	✅	Strong collaboration features with live comments, @mentions, and updates directly on tasks.
Brand guideline enforcement	❌	No templating or automated brand compliance features.
User roles	✅	Role-based permissions, private boards, and restricted views available.
Audit trails	🟡	Activity logs track user changes, but not compliance-grade audits.
Social publishing integrations	❌	No native social publishing; requires third-party automation via Zapier or custom integrations.

Strengths

• Already embedded – Monday is often chosen simply because it is already present at the org and that mkaes adoption easy.
• Flexible structure – Customizable columns and templates allow teams to adapt Monday to their specific workflows without coding.
• Automations and integrations – Built-in automations streamline repetitive tasks, and integrations connect to tools like Slack, Google Drive, and HubSpot.
• Great for lightweight coordination – Perfect for small to mid-sized marketing teams managing campaign requests or content pipelines.

Weaknesses

• Not marketing-specific – While flexible, Monday lacks the strategy, hierarchy, and campaign context marketing teams need.
• No true content preview – Teams can’t visualize posts or creative in context, limiting its value for creative review.
• Limited approval depth – Approvals rely on status changes or automations, not structured review workflows.
• No publishing capabilities – Requires integrations or manual hand-offs for social or CMS publishing.

CoSchedule

Overview:
CoSchedule is a marketing calendar and content management platform designed specifically for marketing teams that need to plan, publish, and measure content in one place. Known for its intuitive drag-and-drop calendar, it helps teams manage blog posts, social content, and campaigns without the complexity of enterprise tools like Percolate or Seismic. It’s particularly popular with smaller teams and agencies that want a simple, affordable way to stay organized. While CoSchedule delivers strong scheduling and publishing functionality, it lacks some of the deeper workflow, preview, and governance features found in higher-end content operations platforms.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	✅	Excellent visual calendar for planning campaigns, blog posts, and social content.
Briefing	🟡	Supports creative briefs through custom templates, but lacks a structured briefing workspace with real context.
Approvals workflow	🟡	Basic approval steps available, but limited multi-stage or hierarchical approval options.
Visibility across channels / teams	✅	Calendar provides visibility into content across marketing channels and team members.
Marketing hierarchy	❌	Lacks formal hierarchy beyond campaign and task grouping.
In-context content preview	❌	Offers basic text previews for social and blog posts, but not true-to-life channel previews.
Integrated asset management / library	🟡	Stores attachments and images, but no real asset management capabilities.
Content versioning & history	🟡	Tracks post revisions and history for blog and social content, but limited depth compared to enterprise tools.
Real-time commenting	✅	Inline commenting on tasks and content with @mentions for collaboration.
Brand guideline enforcement	❌	No automated brand enforcement; relies on templates and user diligence.
User roles	✅	Supports basic roles and permissions for marketing teams and contributors.
Audit trails	🟡	Basic activity logs, but not compliance-level audit tracking.
Social publishing integrations	✅	Native integrations for publishing to social platforms, WordPress, HubSpot, and other CMS tools.

Strengths

• Built-in publishing – One of the few lightweight platforms that allows direct publishing to social media and CMSs.
• Designed for marketers – Purpose-built for marketing coordination and content publishing, not a generic project management system.
• Affordable and approachable – Offers strong functionality at a lower cost than enterprise content operations tools.
• Integrations that work out of the box – Connects easily to WordPress, HubSpot, LinkedIn, Facebook, and more.

Weaknesses

• No true content previews – Previews are limited and not visually accurate across channels.
• Limited workflow sophistication – Approvals and version control are simple and lack governance depth.
• No structured hierarchy – Lacks the ability to represent relationships between campaigns, initiatives, and assets.
• Minimal asset management – Serves as a calendar and publishing tool, not a content library or repository.
• Not built for enterprise collaboration – Better suited for small-to-mid-sized teams; lacks enterprise auditability or brand governance

Loomly

Overview:
Loomly is a social media management and content calendar platform built to help marketing teams plan, collaborate, and publish social and digital content. It’s especially popular among social-first brands and agencies that want an affordable, easy-to-use tool to replace spreadsheets or legacy calendars. While not as broad as Percolate or Seismic in scope, Loomly provides solid planning, collaboration, and publishing features — making it a common choice for teams that need structure and workflow around social content creation.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	✅	Visual content calendar for scheduling and organizing campaigns across social channels.
Briefing	🟡	Simple brief templates can be created in posts, but there’s no dedicated creative brief module.
Approvals workflow	✅	Built-in approval stages allow multiple stakeholders to review and approve content.
Visibility across channels / teams	✅	Provides unified calendar and post views across channels for all team members.
Marketing hierarchy	❌	Focused on post-level planning; no structured hierarchy beyond campaign or calendar grouping.
In-context content preview	✅	Offers channel-accurate previews for social platforms before publishing.
Integrated asset management / library	🟡	Includes a media library for images and videos, but not a full DAM or metadata system.
Content versioning & history	🟡	Maintains basic revision history for posts, but limited version comparison tools.
Real-time commenting	✅	Inline comments and collaboration built directly into posts.
Brand guideline enforcement	🟡	Templates and approval rules promote consistency, but no automated enforcement.
User roles	✅	Role-based permissions and approval roles for contributors, editors, and admins.
Audit trails	🟡	Tracks activity and approvals, though not full compliance-grade logs.
Social publishing integrations	✅	Native integrations for direct publishing to Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Pinterest, and TikTok.

Strengths

• Purpose-built for social marketing – Designed specifically for planning, approving, and publishing social content.
• Channel-accurate previews – Lets marketers see how posts will appear natively on each platform before they go live.
• Easy collaboration – Built-in commenting, notifications, and approvals streamline team communication.
• Out-of-the-box publishing – Eliminates the need for third-party connectors by publishing directly to major social networks.
• Simple and accessible – Quick setup and approachable UI make it a favorite for smaller teams and agencies.

Weaknesses

• Limited campaign depth – While great for social, Loomly isn’t designed for multi-channel campaign planning or hierarchical marketing structures.
• Shallow version control – Content revisions exist but lack enterprise-grade tracking or rollback functionality.
• No long-form or cross-channel previews – Strong for social, but not suited for email, web, or multi-asset content planning.
• Basic asset library – Stores creative files but lacks advanced DAM features or metadata management.
• Light governance – Audit trails and brand enforcement are minimal compared to enterprise platforms.

Trello

Overview:
Trello is a lightweight work management and collaboration tool built around a card-and-board interface. Its visual simplicity and flexibility have made it a favorite for small marketing teams looking to organize campaigns, content calendars, or approval workflows. While it’s easy to customize and quick to adopt, Trello is not a dedicated content marketing platform — it lacks true previews, structured hierarchies, and governance. As such, it often serves as a starting point for teams before they graduate to more purpose-built tools like Opal or CoSchedule.

Evaluation Criteria

Feature	Rating	Notes
Campaign & calendar planning	🟡	Calendar Power-Up enables basic scheduling, but no true marketing calendar or multi-channel planning.
Briefing	🟡	Creative briefs can be added via cards or templates, but lack structure or context linking.
Approvals workflow	🟡	Approvals can be simulated with checklists or labels but no true workflow logic.
Visibility across channels / teams	❌	Boards are siloed; limited visibility across multiple campaigns or teams.
Marketing hierarchy	❌	No way to represent relationships (campaign → initiative → asset); flat structure only.
In-context content preview	❌	No preview functionality — assets open as attachments or links.
Integrated asset management / library	❌	File storage through attachments only; no metadata or reuse functionality.
Content versioning & history	🟡	Card history tracks changes, but no document version control.
Real-time commenting	✅	Strong collaboration with inline comments, tagging, and notifications.
Brand guideline enforcement	❌	No templating or governance features.
User roles	✅	Supports basic role permissions (admin, member, observer).
Audit trails	🟡	Activity log provides a simple view of changes, but lacks compliance-level detail.
Social publishing integrations	❌	No publishing

Strengths

• Simplicity and speed – Trello’s visual, card-based system is intuitive and requires virtually no onboarding.
• Flexible customization – Labels, checklists, and automations can approximate workflows for small teams.
• Low barrier to entry – Free and easy to scale up for lightweight campaign coordination.
• Good for basic collaboration – Real-time comments, tagging, and activity tracking make it easy to keep small teams aligned.

Weaknesses

• Not built for marketing – Lacks campaign hierarchy, structured workflows, and content context.
• No true content preview – Teams can’t visualize how creative looks across channels.
• Limited visibility – Boards become isolated silos; cross-team or multi-channel visibility is poor.
• No integrated publishing – Requires third-party automations for social or CMS workflows.
• Minimal governance – No versioning, brand rules, or approval tracking beyond basic lists and labels.

Explore Opal — The Modern Alternative to Percolate and Seismic

Trusted by global brands like Starbucks, Target, General Motors, and UnitedHealthcare, Opal brings structure to marketing campaigns, helping teams align strategy, content, and approvals in one connected system. It’s everything marketers loved about Percolate — reimagined for today’s multi-channel world.

If your team is looking for a purpose-built platform to plan campaigns, manage collaboration, and tell consistent stories at scale, see what Opal can do. Request a demo to explore how the world’s leading brands run their marketing in Opal.